Claude Code's Silent Git Reset: What Actually Happened and What It Means for AI Dev Tools
The Problem: When Your AI Assistant Destroys Your Uncommitted Work Imagine this: you're three hours into a coding session. You've written 200 lines of carefully crafted logic — none of it committed...
Source: DEV Community
The Problem: When Your AI Assistant Destroys Your Uncommitted Work Imagine this: you're three hours into a coding session. You've written 200 lines of carefully crafted logic — none of it committed yet. Then, without any warning, every single change vanishes. The file snaps back to what it was at the last commit. No prompt. No confirmation. No explanation. This isn't a hypothetical. Multiple developers have experienced some version of this with AI coding assistants, and the investigation into one such incident — which generated significant attention on Hacker News and GitHub — offers a master class in how hard it is to diagnose silent data destruction in a compiled, closed-source tool. Let's dig into what happened, what it revealed about AI dev tool architecture, and what developers should actually do to protect themselves. The Update: It Wasn't Claude Code After All After significant community attention and debate, the original reporter updated their GitHub issue. The root cause was a
